From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 10, 2018
2017-1895 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 10, 2018)

Opinion

2017-1895 2018-1131

09-10-2018

RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD., AUROBINDO PHARMA USA INC., Defendants-Cross-Appellants

DOUGLAS J. NASH, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LAURA VOGEL, Boston, MA; BELLA SATRA, Albany, NY. TIMOTHY KRATZ, Kratz & Barry LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by GEORGE BARRY, III.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-01203-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

DOUGLAS J. NASH, Barclay Damon, LLP, Syracuse, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by LAURA VOGEL, Boston, MA; BELLA SATRA, Albany, NY. TIMOTHY KRATZ, Kratz & Barry LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by GEORGE BARRY, III. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 10, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 10, 2018
2017-1895 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 10, 2018)
Case details for

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:RECKITT BENCKISER LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 10, 2018

Citations

2017-1895 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 10, 2018)