From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Recker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jan 9, 2001
34 S.W.3d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77545

January 9, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE EMMETT O'BRIEN

Douglas R. Hoff, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Andrea L. Mazza, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J. and Paul J. Simon and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ.

ORDER



Fred Recker (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Recker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jan 9, 2001
34 S.W.3d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Recker v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRED RECKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Jan 9, 2001

Citations

34 S.W.3d 872 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)