From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Recio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 5, 2012
96 So. 3d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–3980.

2012-09-5

Lee Anthony RECIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00–2892 CF10A. Lee Anthony Recio, Lake Butler, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00–2892 CF10A.
Lee Anthony Recio, Lake Butler, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant is cautioned against future motions, petitions or appeals raising the same challenges to his sentence in this case. Such attempts will result in referral to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures which may include forfeiture of gain time, see§ 944.279(1), Fla. Stat., and issuance of an order to show cause why further sanctions barring pro se filings should not be imposed as well under State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48–49 (Fla.1999).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Recio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 5, 2012
96 So. 3d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Recio v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lee Anthony RECIO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Sep 5, 2012

Citations

96 So. 3d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)