Opinion
2:23-cv-791 MJP
12-11-2023
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION
MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to file a Notice of Appeal. (Dkt. No. 78.) Having reviewed the Motion, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's request.
The Court entered an Order dismissing Plaintiff's case with prejudice on August 21, 2023. (Dkt. No. 61.) Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal on October 4, 2023. (Dkt. No. 71.) Plaintiff now asks the Court for an Extension to File a Notice of Appeal. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for two reasons. First, Plaintiff's Motion is a Ninth Circuit Form that is utilized by the Court of Appeals and is not proper before this Court. Second, the Ninth Circuit assigned Plaintiff a case number, and upon review of that docket, it appears Plaintiff's case before the Ninth Circuit is pending. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion is unnecessary. The Court DENIES the Motion.
The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.