From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rechtfertig v. Spiering

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 6, 2007
740 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2007)

Opinion

No. A07-1306.

November 6, 2007.

Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals.

Donald C. Erickson, Heather Korpela, Fryberger Buchanan Smith Frederick P.A., Duluth, MN, for Relator.

S. Forrest Hutchinson, Forrest Hutchinson Assoc, Duluth, MN, for Respondent.

Lori Swanson, Minnesota Attorney General, Rory H. Foley, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for Special Compensation Fund.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER


Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 19, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).


Summaries of

Rechtfertig v. Spiering

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 6, 2007
740 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2007)
Case details for

Rechtfertig v. Spiering

Case Details

Full title:Joshua RECHTFERTIG, Relator, v. Michael SPIERING, Uninsured, Respondent…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 6, 2007

Citations

740 N.W.2d 774 (Minn. 2007)