Opinion
Civil 3:21-cv-1282
05-07-2024
NYHEIM REAVES, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER ROSSMAN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
SYLVIA H. RAMBO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2024, upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Saporito's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 87) recommending that the plaintiff's pro se letter-motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 86) be denied, and noting that no objections have been filed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.