From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

REAN v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 11, 2011
2:10-cv-1094-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-cv-1094-RLH-RJJ.

October 11, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is an Order (#76) entered by the Honorable Robert J. Johnston regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#73).

Plaintiff filed an Objection to Judge Johnston's Order (#77) in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and this matter was referred for consideration.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Order of Magistrate Judge Johnston is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Johnston's Order (#76) is AFFIRMED, Plaintiff's Objection (#77) is overruled, and Plaintiff's Motion to Appointment of Counsel (#73) is denied.


Summaries of

REAN v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 11, 2011
2:10-cv-1094-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

REAN v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT RAYMOND REAN, Plaintiff(s), v. CITY OF LAS VEGAS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

2:10-cv-1094-RLH-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 11, 2011)