From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
541 S.W.3d 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80249

03-06-2018

Shawn David REAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Samuel E. Buffaloe, Columbia for appellant. Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City for respondent.


Samuel E. Buffaloe, Columbia for appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam

Shawn Reams appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Reams contends his plea counsel was ineffective for refusing to take the case to trial and insisting that Reams plead guilty. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Reams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
541 S.W.3d 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Reams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Shawn David REAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 6, 2018

Citations

541 S.W.3d 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)