From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ream v. Ream

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 15, 1939
24 N.E.2d 96 (N.Y. 1939)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1939

Decided November 15, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, COTILLO, J.

Bethel V. Ream, in person, and Carl Sherman for motion.

Harold Rosenblum, Milton Rosenblum and Clarence Blair Mitchell opposed.


The defendant Bethel Veech Ream, having given notice to the court that he has attained the age of twenty-one years, is entitled to appear upon the appeal by attorneys of his own selection. Sherman Goldring, having filed a notice of appearance for the defendant, may appear in his behalf upon the argument of the appeal and will then be free to state the position which the defendant desires to take upon the appeal.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted to the extent indicated in this opinion; otherwise denied.


Summaries of

Ream v. Ream

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 15, 1939
24 N.E.2d 96 (N.Y. 1939)
Case details for

Ream v. Ream

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD K. REAM, Appellant and Respondent, v. ROBERT C. REAM, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 15, 1939

Citations

24 N.E.2d 96 (N.Y. 1939)
24 N.E.2d 96

Citing Cases

Tenney v. Rosenthal

The plaintiff is privileged to continue in such fiduciary capacity to prosecute the action for the benefit of…

O'Leary v. Brown Seal Realty Corp.

He and not the guardian became the party in interest and had control of the action. He could settle,…