REAM v. LINDBERG

Full title: GUY A. REAM, UEP/FLDS, Plaintiffs, v. DENISE LINDBERG, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Dec 9, 2009

Case No. 2:09-cv-856 CW (D. Utah Dec. 9, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-856 CW.

December 9, 2009

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge

Plaintiff Guy Ream, apparently on his own behalf and as a purported representative of "UEP/FLDS," filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1985 action in forma pauperis. This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Clark Waddoups, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Brooke C. Wells under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

After being referred the case, Judge Wells considered the sufficiency of Mr. Ream's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). On November 10, 2009, Judge Wells issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the complaint be dismissed under one or both of those subsections, either for failure to state a claim or because the defendants are immune from suit. Mr. Ream filed a timely objection to the Report and Recommendation.

After reviewing the file de novo, the court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is correct in every material respect and that Mr. Ream's objection has no merit. Accordingly, the court hereby APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, the complaint is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.