From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Realty, Inc. v. City of High Point

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Apr 1, 1978
242 S.E.2d 895 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 7718SC585

Filed 18 April 1978

Appeal and Error 6.9 — pretrial orders — no immediate appeal Pretrial orders declaring certain evidence admissible or inadmissible and purporting to fix what the rule of damages should be at trial are not immediately appealable.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Collier, Judge. Order entered 24 May 1977 in Superior Court, GUILFORD County. Heard in the Court of Appeals 6 April 1978.

Morgan, Post, Herring Morgan by Edward N. Post for appellant.

Knox Walker for appellee.


In this condemnation proceeding the plaintiff property owner filed a pretrial motion to exclude certain evidence upon the trial. After a hearing, the court entered an order denying the motion and fixing what the measure of damages should be upon the trial of the case. From this order, plaintiff filed notice of appeal.


A pretrial order declaring certain evidence admissible or inadmissible is indeterminate and subject to later modification. Knight v. Power Co., 34 N.C. App. 218, 237 S.E.2d 574 (1977). The same is true of a pretrial order purporting to six what the rule of damages should be at the trial. Green v. Insurance Co., 250 N.C. 730, 110 S.E.2d 321 (1959). Such orders are not immediately appealable. 1 Strong's N.C. Index 3rd, Appeal and Error, 6.9.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges VAUGHN and WEBB concur.


Summaries of

Realty, Inc. v. City of High Point

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Apr 1, 1978
242 S.E.2d 895 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Realty, Inc. v. City of High Point

Case Details

Full title:ERVIN R. DAVIS REALTY, INC. v. CITY OF HIGH POINT

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 1, 1978

Citations

242 S.E.2d 895 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978)
242 S.E.2d 895

Citing Cases

Maffei v. Alert Cable TV of North Carolina, Inc.

An order purporting to fix what the rule of damages will be at trial is indeterminate and not immediately…

Lazenby v. Godwin

The rule permits modification of the pretrial order by the trial court judge when necessary to prevent…