From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Realty Associates, Ltd. v. Bausch

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 7, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 874 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

May 7, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, HERMAN C. STOUTE, J.

Philip T. Lombardo for appellant.

Louis Fine for respondent.


Single-room occupancy in excess of two persons is not forbidden in a building subject to section 248 Mult. Dwell. of the Multiple Dwelling Law, provided that the rooms conform to the requirements of the section. In order to procure an eviction it is incumbent on the landlord to show that they do not ( Shapiro v. Collins, 6 A.D.2d 1038, revg. 12 Misc.2d 71).

The final order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to tenant to abide the event.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Realty Associates, Ltd. v. Bausch

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 7, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 874 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Realty Associates, Ltd. v. Bausch

Case Details

Full title:REALTY ASSOCIATES, LTD., Respondent, v. WILLIAM BAUSCH, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 7, 1959

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 874 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
186 N.Y.S.2d 692

Citing Cases

Zarfin Realty Corp. v. Reilly

Per Curiam. Single room occupancy by more than the permitted number of persons does not of itself establish…

Ehrenfeld v. Ward

Accordingly, the final order in favor of the tenant dismissing landlord's petition should be reversed, with…