Opinion
No. 09-09-00232-CR
Submitted on June 8, 2010.
Opinion Delivered June 23, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.
On Appeal from the 253rd District Court, Liberty County, Texas, Trial Cause No. CR27419.
Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and KREGER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury found Ronald David Reagon to be guilty of indecency with a child by sexual contact. See TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. § 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2009). After Reagon entered a plea of true to habitual offender enhancement allegations, the jury assessed a life sentence as punishment for the offense. On appeal, Reagon's counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On March 4, 2010, we granted an extension of time for the appellant to file a pro se brief. No response has been filed with this Court. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. AFFIRMED.
Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.