From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Readon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 5, 2006
925 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D05-362.

April 5, 2006.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(1)(D) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Leonard Glick, Judge.

Larry Clyde Readon, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Lucretia A. Pitts, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, C.J., and SHEPHERD and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). All but one of the allegations raised on appeal are without merit and do not require discussion. The sole viable issue is that the written sentence did not comport with the oral pronouncement of sentence. We do not address the merits of this issue because the matter was not presented to the trial court in the original Rule 3.800(a) motion. We therefore affirm without prejudice to allow defendant to file a 3.800(a) motion on this issue.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Readon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 5, 2006
925 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Readon v. State

Case Details

Full title:Larry Clyde READON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 5, 2006

Citations

925 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to appellant to seek relief from the trial court on this issue.…