From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reado v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Nov 11, 1966
408 S.W.2d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

November 11, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Fayette County, Joseph J. Bradley, J.

Herbert Ryan Lee Reado, pro se.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., Harold T. Hotopp, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


This is an appeal from a judgment in an RCr 11.42 proceeding whereby the court refused to vacate appellant's 1958 conviction for rape. A previous such motion was denied in March 1965 and no appeal was taken to this Court from that judgment. The present RCr 11.42 proceeding was filed in December 1965 in which the same relief was asked again for the same generic reasons.

RCr 11.42 declares in pertinent part, "* * * Final disposition of the motion shall conclude all issues that could reasonably have been presented in the same proceeding * * *." The courts are not required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief from the same prisoner. Tipton v. Commonwealth, Ky., 398 S.W.2d 493 (1966).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Reado v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Nov 11, 1966
408 S.W.2d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Reado v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Herbert Ryan Lee READO, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Nov 11, 1966

Citations

408 S.W.2d 438 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Coffey v. Commonwealth

"The courts are not required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief from the same…