From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Read v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1945
269 App. Div. 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

December 17, 1945.

Present — Close, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.


Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate, a six and a half-year-old boy, who was run over and killed by defendant's truck while it was moving backward in a roadway. After trial, the jury found for the defendant, and the order from which an appeal is taken directs that the verdict be set aside and grants a new trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to abide the event. The trial court did not in its ruling or order state any reason for setting aside the verdict. We again call attention to the decision of this court in the case of Coleman v. Brooklyn Queens Transit Corp. ( 252 App. Div. 215), and suggest that the rule laid down therein be followed by trial courts.


Summaries of

Read v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1945
269 App. Div. 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Read v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE READ, as Administratrix of the Estate of DONALD READ, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 1056 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

F.A. MacCluer v. Distribuidores Industriales

If a trial justice grants a motion for the direction of a verdict, he should state the reasons therefor. (Cf.…