From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rea v. Re/Max, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00090-RPM (D. Colo. Mar. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00090-RPM

03-08-2012

DAVID W. REA, JR., Plaintiff, v. RE/MAX, L.L.C.; DAVID LINIGER; MARGARET KELLY; JOHN DUPONT, and MIKE REAGAN, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Upon consideration of the complaint, the defendants' motion to dismiss and plaintiff's opposition, it is

ORDERED that for the failure to state claims for relief and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the third and fourth claims for relief are dismissed and because the plaintiff has clarified that the first and second claims for relief are not alleged against the individual defendants, they are dismissed from this civil action. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss is denied in all other respects as to the first and second claims for relief, the scope of which will be considered at the scheduling conference.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Rea v. Re/Max, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00090-RPM (D. Colo. Mar. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Rea v. Re/Max, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. REA, JR., Plaintiff, v. RE/MAX, L.L.C.; DAVID LINIGER; MARGARET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 8, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00090-RPM (D. Colo. Mar. 8, 2012)