From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Re Water Rights of Rogue River

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 21, 1925
235 P. 279 (Or. 1925)

Opinion

Argued January 15, 1925

Affirmed April 21, 1925

From Jackson: F.M. CALKINS, Judge.

For appellants there was a brief over the names of Mr. Gus Newbury and Mr. H.D. Norton, with an oral argument by Mr. Newbury.

For respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. A.E. Reames.


AFFIRMED.


These two cases were heard on January 15, 1925, on all the issues therein and taken under advisement. On examination of the record it was discovered that an essential part of the testimony is not in the record, thus rendering it impossible to examine properly the questions involved. Although repeated notifications have been sent to counsel on both sides to produce the missing testimony, all efforts in that direction have been unavailing and the record is still in such condition that no intelligent decision can be framed. For these reasons the decrees of the Circuit Court are affirmed pro forma, but without costs or disbursements in favor of either party in this court. AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Re Water Rights of Rogue River

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 21, 1925
235 P. 279 (Or. 1925)
Case details for

Re Water Rights of Rogue River

Case Details

Full title:RE DETERMINATION OF WATER RIGHTS OF ROGUE RIVER. GEORGE W. LANCE ET AL. v…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 21, 1925

Citations

235 P. 279 (Or. 1925)
235 P. 279

Citing Cases

Re Water Rights of Burnt River

Where a small tributary on which two parties claim a water right and the controversy between them is over the…