From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 17, 1999
No. 98-4096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 17, 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-4096.

Opinion filed June 17, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County, Kathleen Dekker, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; L. Michael Billmeier,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


R.D. appeals a restitution order arguing that, because the order establishing the amount of restitution pursuant to section 775.089(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), was entered more than 60 days from the date of the disposition order contrary to rule 3.800(c), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure, the trial court had no jurisdiction to order restitution. We find the appellant's argument without merit and affirm.

In the instant case, the plea agreement, plea hearing, and disposition order all show that the trial court was imposing a restitution obligation. Under the circumstances, because the order establishing the amount of restitution was entered in a timely manner, the trial court had the jurisdiction to determine the amount of restitution beyond the sixty-day period in rule 3.800(c). See L.O. v. State, 718 So.2d 155 (Fla. 1998).

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK AND BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.


Summaries of

R.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 17, 1999
No. 98-4096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 17, 1999)
Case details for

R.D. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.D., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 17, 1999

Citations

No. 98-4096 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 17, 1999)