From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 25, 1990
564 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-220.

July 25, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, John P. Kuder, J.

Barbara M. Linthicum, Public Defender, and Lynn A. Williams, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


We find that the record below supports the adjudication of delinquency. However, we find that the trial court erred in placing the child on community control until his nineteenth birthday. Since the child was found guilty of the offense of criminal mischief, a second degree misdemeanor, the maximum statutorily authorized period of community control was sixty days. Section 39.11, Florida Statutes (1989) and J.S. v. State, 552 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appealed order is affirmed, except as to the duration of community control. That portion of the appealed order which specifies the duration of community control is reversed, and the cause is remanded for modification of the order in accordance with this opinion.

WENTWORTH, NIMMONS and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 25, 1990
564 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

R.D. v. State

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF R.D., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 25, 1990

Citations

564 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

E.J. v. State

Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to limit the term of community control to the maximum…