Opinion
2013-12-18
RBC NICE BEARINGS, INC., et al. v. SKF USA, INC.
Robert B. Flynn, Steven J. Zakrzewski, Hartford, David Richman, pro hac vice, and Matthew D. Janssen, in support of the petition. Joseph W. Martini, Stamford, Kim E. Rinehart and Matthew C. Brown, New Haven, in opposition.
Robert B. Flynn, Steven J. Zakrzewski, Hartford, David Richman, pro hac vice, and Matthew D. Janssen, in support of the petition. Joseph W. Martini, Stamford, Kim E. Rinehart and Matthew C. Brown, New Haven, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 146 Conn.App. 288, 78 A.3d 195, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court incorrectly decided that the manufacturer failed to retract its waiver of its distributor's minimum purchase requirement as set out in General Statutes § 42a–2–209 (5)?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed or did it substitute its judgment for that of the trial court when it determined that the conduct of the parties did not give rise to a waiver of the minimum purchase requirement?”