Opinion
No. 18-1944
11-05-2020
Ali RAZAK; Kenan Sabani; Khaldoun Cherdoud, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; Gegen, LLC
Jeremy E. Abay, Esq., John K. Weston, Esq., Sacks Weston, Philadelphia, PA, Ashley Keller, Esq., Seth A. Meyer, Esq., Keller Lenkner, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Sophia Behnia, Esq., Littler Mendelson, San Francisco, CA, Wendy S. Buckingham, Esq., Paul C. Lantis, Esq., Littler Mendelson, Philadelphia, PA, Robert W. Pritchard, Esq., Joshua Vaughn, Esq., Littler Mendelson, Pittsburgh, PA, Niloy Ray, Esq., Littler Mendelson, Minneapolis, MN, Andrew M. Spurchise, Esq., Littler Mendelson, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees. Gabriel K. Gillett, Esq., Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, Adam G. Unikowsky, Esq., Jenner & Block, Washington, DC, for Amici Appellees Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Federation of Independent Business. Sharon M. Dietrich, Esq., Community Legal Services, Philadelphia, PA, for Amici Appellants National Employment Law Project, Community Legal Services, Economic Policy Institute.
Jeremy E. Abay, Esq., John K. Weston, Esq., Sacks Weston, Philadelphia, PA, Ashley Keller, Esq., Seth A. Meyer, Esq., Keller Lenkner, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Sophia Behnia, Esq., Littler Mendelson, San Francisco, CA, Wendy S. Buckingham, Esq., Paul C. Lantis, Esq., Littler Mendelson, Philadelphia, PA, Robert W. Pritchard, Esq., Joshua Vaughn, Esq., Littler Mendelson, Pittsburgh, PA, Niloy Ray, Esq., Littler Mendelson, Minneapolis, MN, Andrew M. Spurchise, Esq., Littler Mendelson, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.
Gabriel K. Gillett, Esq., Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, Adam G. Unikowsky, Esq., Jenner & Block, Washington, DC, for Amici Appellees Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Federation of Independent Business.
Sharon M. Dietrich, Esq., Community Legal Services, Philadelphia, PA, for Amici Appellants National Employment Law Project, Community Legal Services, Economic Policy Institute.
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, GREENAWAY, JR., and PORTER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION
The panel hereby ORDERS that the Opinion filed March 3, 2020 be amended to include the language appearing in angle brackets below.
The sentence at page 16 reading, "But, if a court finds that there are any issues of fact that remain in dispute, it must resolve those disputes prior to granting summary judgment" shall be amended to read: "But, if a court finds that there are any issues of < material> fact that remain in < genuine> dispute, it must resolve those disputes prior to granting summary judgment."
The sentence at page 17 reading, "DialAmerica teaches that where there are questions of fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder" shall be amended to read: "DialAmerica teaches that where there are < genuine> questions of < material> fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder."