Opinion
Civil Action 16-573
07-30-2024
ALI RAZAK, et al. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
ORDER RE: POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2024, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. Defendants' motion for a declaration of a mistrial and to dismiss this action with prejudice (ECF 343) is GRANTED.
2. In the alternative, Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law (ECF 342) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiffs' motion for judgment as a matter of law and assorted other relief (344) is DENIED.
4. Plaintiffs' objection to the jury pool (ECF 329) is DENIED.
5. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.
In so granting, the Court notes that Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' sixth cause of action for declaratory relief (ECF 308) is also GRANTED.
The Complaint is therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.