Opinion
2:18-cv-01622-GMN-NJK
12-19-2022
KORY RAZAGHI, an individual, ATTENTUS L.L.C., a Nevada Limited-Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. AHMAD RAZAGHI, an individual; MANUEL MORGAN, an individual; and RAZAGHI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, an Arizona Limited-Liability Company; Defendants.
IT IS SO STIPULATED. MARQUIS AURBACH Collin Jayne Phillip S. Aurbach Collin M. Jayne, Attorneys for Plaintiffs BAILEY❖KENNEDY Paul Williams Dennis L. Kennedy, Paul C. Williams ROTHSTEIN DONATELLI LLP Richard W. Hughes Donna M. Connolly Attorneys for Defendants Ahmad Razaghi and Razaghi Development Company, LLC
(FIRST REQUEST)
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
MARQUIS AURBACH
Collin Jayne
Phillip S. Aurbach
Collin M. Jayne,
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BAILEY❖KENNEDY
Paul Williams
Dennis L. Kennedy,
Paul C. Williams
ROTHSTEIN DONATELLI LLP
Richard W. Hughes
Donna M. Connolly
Attorneys for Defendants Ahmad Razaghi and Razaghi Development Company, LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 197]
GLORIAM. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs Kory Razaghi and Attentus L.L.C. (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, Marquis Aurbach, and Defendants Ahmad Razaghi and Razaghi Development Company, LLC (“Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Rothstein Donatelli LLP and Bailey Kennedy, hereby agree and jointly stipulate to the following:
1. Defendants Ahmad Razaghi and Razaghi Development, LLC filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion for Summary Judgment”) on November 30, 2022 [ECF No. 197].
2. In light of holiday travel plans for Plaintiffs and their counsel, Plaintiffs are unable to meet the deadline of December 21, 2022 currently scheduled for Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, and thus the Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment by 14 days, through and including Wednesday, January 4, 2023.
3. The Parties have further agreed to a 14-day extension for Defendants to file any Reply in support of the Motion for Summary Judgment, through and including February 1, 2023.
4. This is the Parties' first request to extend deadlines pertaining to the Motion for Summary Judgment, and this stipulation is being entered in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
5. WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for Plaintiffs Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 197] be extended through and including January 4, 2023, and
6. WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the deadline for Defendants' Reply in Support of the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 197] be extended through and including February 1, 2023.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 197] (FIRST REQUEST) with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court by using the court's CM/ECF system on the 19th day of December, 2022.
[√] further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
□ I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the following non-CM/ECF participants:
N/A
Krista Busch
An employee of Marquis Aurbach