From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raynor v. Rollins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 25, 2010
399 F. App'x 783 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1618.

Submitted: October 19, 2010.

Decided: October 25, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00296-D).

Freddie N. Raynor, Appellant Pro Se. Robert O. Crawford, III, Crawford Law Office, Raleigh, North Carolina; Lisa Granberry Corbett, North Carolina Department Of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Freddie N. Raynor appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Raynor's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Raynor has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we deny Raynor's motion for a stay and for appointment of counsel, and we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Raynor v. Rollins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 25, 2010
399 F. App'x 783 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Raynor v. Rollins

Case Details

Full title:Freddie N. RAYNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bob ROLLINS (Wake County); Fred…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

399 F. App'x 783 (4th Cir. 2010)