From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raymundo Garcia Q v. Quintana

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 23, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-93 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-93 Erie.

August 23, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This action was received by the Clerk of Court on April 19, 2010 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 28], filed on July 29, 2011, recommended that the action be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this case. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections and no objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2011;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this case.

The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 28] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on July 29, 2011, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Raymundo Garcia Q v. Quintana

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 23, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-93 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Raymundo Garcia Q v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:RAYMUNDO GARCIA Q, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO QUINTANA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-93 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 23, 2011)