Rayburn v. Webb

Full title: Charla A. RAYBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russ WEBB, Defendant-Appellee…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 6, 2001

11 F. App'x 875 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

11 Fed.Appx. 875 (9th Cir. 2001) Charla A. RAYBURN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Russ WEBB, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-35601. D.C. No. CV-00-00015-JWS. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 6, 2001

Submitted February 12, 2001 ¹.

1 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ²

2 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Charla A. Rayburn appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action alleging

Page 876.

violations of the Privacy Act. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Upon our de novo review, we affirm the district court. See Dittman v. State of Cal., 191 F.3d 1020, 1026-27 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1261, 120 S.Ct. 2717, 147 L.Ed.2d 982 (2000); Wilson v. A.H. Belo Corp., 87 F.3d 393, 396 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.