From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Wolfe

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-264-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-264-KRG-KAP.

March 22, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on February 22, 2011, docket no. 40, recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 22, be granted as to the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and denied as to defendant Wolfe.

The parties were notified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed objections and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2010, it is

ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss, docket no. 22, is granted in part and the complaint against defendant Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole is dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Ray v. Wolfe

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-264-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Ray v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH RAY, Plaintiff v. TIM WOLFE and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-264-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2011)