From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Sullivan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01699-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01699-DAD-HBK

06-01-2021

EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED APRIL 27, 2021 (DOC. NO. 10)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On April 27, 2021, the court submitted Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff pay the full filing fee or face this matter's dismissal. (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations on May 11, 2021. (Doc. No. 11).

At this time the court finds it necessary to address certain arguments raised in the objections.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The Findings and Recommendations entered on April 27, 2021 (Doc. No. 10) are WITHDRAWN. The court, if appropriate, will issue modified Findings and Recommendations in the near future.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ray v. Sullivan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01699-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Ray v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01699-DAD-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)