From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81408

March 18, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; William Corrigan, Judge.

Lynn Ray, Licking, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joel A. Block, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before William H. Crandall, Jr., P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Glenn A. Norton, J.



ORDER


Lynn Ray appeals from a judgment denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 24.035. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim.P. 2002, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Ray v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Ray v. State

Case Details

Full title:LYNN RAY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Mar 18, 2003

Citations

100 S.W.3d 148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)