From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
Case Number 11-11100 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number 11-11100

12-20-2012

JOHN RAY, Petitioner, v. MITCH PERRY, Respondent.


Honorable David M. Lawson


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

This matter is before the Court on the petitioner's second motion to file a supplemental reply brief in support of his petition. The respondent filed a response to the petition on September 23, 2011. The petitioner filed a reply on November 9, 2011. On October 26, 2012, the Court granted the petitioner's earlier motion and permitted him to file a supplemental brief for the purpose of bringing to the Court's attention any legal authority in support of the petition not previously briefed by the petitioner. In that order, the Court allowed the petitioner to file a supplemental brief of no more than ten pages, on or before December 10, 2012.

On December 12, 2012, the Clerk docketed petitioner's second motion for leave to file a supplemental brief, with his proposed brief included [dkt. #15]. The brief in support of the motion includes two pages of legal argument in support of the petition and an attached unpublished case decided by the Michigan court of appeals. The handwritten motion bears petitioner's signature next to the stamp of a notary public dated December 7, 2012. Under the "prison mailbox rule," documents sent to the Clerk by a prisoner are deemed filed on the day they are dated and signed, even if received and docketed on a later date. Williams v. Birkett, 670 F.3d 729, 732 n.1 (6th Cir. 2012); Hudson v. Martin, 68 F.Supp.2d 798, 800 n.2 (E.D. Mich. 1999). The Court finds that the petitioner has complied with its earlier order and filed his supplemental brief in a timely manner and in accord with the limits of the Court's order. The Court therefore will grant the petitioner's second motion for leave to file supplemental brief and deem the enclosed brief as filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner's motion for leave to file supplemental brief [dkt. #15] is GRANTED. The supplemental brief included in the motion is deemed filed.

_____________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on December 20, 2012.

Deborah R. Tofil

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Ray v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
Case Number 11-11100 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Ray v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RAY, Petitioner, v. MITCH PERRY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

Case Number 11-11100 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 20, 2012)