From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Ohio

U.S.
Dec 5, 1960
364 U.S. 476 (1960)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

No. 237, Misc.

Decided December 5, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 201, 163 N.E.2d 176.

Ralph Atkinson for appellant.


The motion for leave to supplement the jurisdictional statement is granted. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


Summaries of

Ray v. Ohio

U.S.
Dec 5, 1960
364 U.S. 476 (1960)
Case details for

Ray v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:RAY v . OHIO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 5, 1960

Citations

364 U.S. 476 (1960)