From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 9, 2012
366 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 96921.

2012-05-9

Darryl Robert RAY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theoda E. MILLS, Defendant/Appellant.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael F. Stelzer, Judge. Darryl Robert Ray, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se. Theoda E. Mills, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Michael F. Stelzer, Judge.
Darryl Robert Ray, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se. Theoda E. Mills, St. Louis, MO, Acting pro se.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Theoda E. Mills (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a trial de novo awarding Darryl Robert Ray damages in the amount of $1,639.53 ($1,387.53 in medical and $258 in property) against Appellant and denying Appellant's counterclaim. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and did not erroneously declare or misapply the law. 6226 Northwood Condominium Ass'n v. Dwyer, 330 S.W.3d 504, 505 (Mo.App. E.D.2010). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ray v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
May 9, 2012
366 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Ray v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:Darryl Robert RAY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theoda E. MILLS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

366 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)