From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. McDonald

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2022
Civil Action 3:20-1697 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:20-1697

03-30-2022

FREDERICK T. RAY, III, Plaintiff v. PAMELA MCDONALD, et al., Defendants


ORDER

MALACHY E. MANNION UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. DOC Defendants' motion to dismiss Defendants Goyne, Lukashenski, Miller, and Ransom (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE these named Defendants from the above captioned action.
2. Defendant Mather's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim of loss of CPS certification and CPS prison job (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to TERMINATE Defendant Mather from the above captioned action.
3. DOC Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claims regarding Administrative Confinement and loss of CPS certification and CPS prison job (Doc. 7) is GRANTED.
4. Remaining DOC Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amendment Retaliation claims (Doc. 7) is DENIED.
5. Within twenty (21) days of the date of this Order, remaining DOC Defendants shall file an answer or other responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Ray v. McDonald

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 30, 2022
Civil Action 3:20-1697 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Ray v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK T. RAY, III, Plaintiff v. PAMELA MCDONALD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 30, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:20-1697 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2022)