From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RAY v. HOGG

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 29, 2007
CASE NUMBER: 05-73910 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 29, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 05-73910.

October 29, 2007


ORDER


On October 24, 2007, the Court held a hearing on the parties' Motions in Limine: 1) Defendants' Motion in Limine Regarding Prior Convictions, and 2) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Quash Testimony of Deputies Wade and Hogg. Before the Court heard oral argument, Plaintiff withdrew a second motion in limine — Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony. For the reasons stated on the record:

A. Defendants' Motion in Limine Regarding Prior Convictions is DENIED. Defendants can only introduce the fact that Plaintiff has a felony conviction and is serving a life sentence. Defendants also will not be permitted to question Plaintiff about whether he "regrets" the crimes for which he is currently incarcerated, inasmuch as it is unclear whether Plaintiff has exhausted his criminal appeals and, if not, such questions may impair his Fifth Amendment rights.
B. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Quash Testimony of Deputies Wade and Hogg is DENIED.

The Court also met with the parties in chambers regarding the exhibits which will be introduced at trial. The Court reserved ruling on four defense exhibits (which were renumbered by Defendants as indicated) to which Plaintiffs object:

505 Plaintiff's Law Library Grievance — 9/4/2004 506 Plaintiff's Telephone Access Grievance — 9/4/2004 507 Plaintiff's Recreation Access Grievance — 9/4/2004 508 Plaintiff's Social Service Department Request forms Defendants may introduce redacted copies of Exhibits 505 through 507. The substance of the grievance and (where applicable) the response must be redacted. Defendant may only show Plaintiff's name, the fact that it is a grievance, and (where applicable) that there was response.

Defendants may not introduce Exhibit 508.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

RAY v. HOGG

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 29, 2007
CASE NUMBER: 05-73910 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 29, 2007)
Case details for

RAY v. HOGG

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HENRY RAY, Plaintiff(s), v. DEPUTY HOGG, et al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 29, 2007

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 05-73910 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 29, 2007)