From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Hasem

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-0072 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0072 WBS AC P

12-20-2021

ANTHONY D. RAY, Plaintiff, v. O. HASEM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 22, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued October 22, 2021 (ECF No. 13), are ADOPTED in full, and

2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file a completed non-prisoner in forma pauperis application. See generally 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).


Summaries of

Ray v. Hasem

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-0072 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Ray v. Hasem

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY D. RAY, Plaintiff, v. O. HASEM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0072 WBS AC P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)