From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Hamidullah

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 25, 2008
262 F. App'x 490 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7121.

Submitted: January 10, 2008.

Decided: January 25, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:06-cv-01201-RBH; 4:06-cv-01178-RBH).

Michael R. Ray, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael R. Ray, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254 (2000) and denying his subsequent Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss as to the denial of § 2254 relief and affirm as to the denial of § 2241 relief for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ray v. Hamidullah, Nos. 4:06-cv-01178-RBH; 4:06-cv-01201-RBH, 2007 WL 465440 (D.S.C. Feb. 6 July 17, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.


Summaries of

Ray v. Hamidullah

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 25, 2008
262 F. App'x 490 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Ray v. Hamidullah

Case Details

Full title:Michael R. RAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Matthew B. HAMIDULLAH, Warden of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

262 F. App'x 490 (4th Cir. 2008)