From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. First Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 29, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-01814-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-01814-MMD-CWH

11-29-2012

JACQUELINE RAY, Plaintiff, v. FIRST TRANSIT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

(dkt. no. 6)

Before the Court is the Findings and Recommendation of the Honorable C.W. Hoffman, United States Magistrate Judge, entered October 2, 2012. (Dkt. no. 6.) The Findings and Recommendation recommends dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. The Recommendation explains that Plaintiff's Complaint was originally dismissed without prejudice. The order dismissing the Complaint noted the deficiencies in the Complaint, and allowed Plaintiff thirty (30) days to amend. (Dkt. no. 4.) Plaintiff did not do so. Magistrate Judge Hoffman accordingly recommends dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice. (Dkt. no. 6.) No objections have been filed to the Findings and Recommendation.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and determines that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Plaintiff's Complaint (dkt. no. 5) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

______________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ray v. First Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 29, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-01814-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Ray v. First Transit

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE RAY, Plaintiff, v. FIRST TRANSIT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-01814-MMD-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2012)