From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. City of Milwaukee

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 16, 2007
Case No. 06-C-1226 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 06-C-1226.

October 16, 2007


ORDER


On October 8, 2007, the defendants filed a motion to take a deposition from Lamar A. Ray, the pro se plaintiff who is presently incarcerated in a federal penitentiary. The court granted the motion by margin order on October 9, 2007. The plaintiff has now responded, requesting that the motion be denied on the ground that he is seeking to retain counsel and further that his institution is now in lockdown status as a result of an assault. Plaintiff fears that if he is taken for a deposition, other inmates may believe he is cooperating with authorities.

Based upon the plaintiff's response, the court will stay its order granting the motion for a period of 45 days. Plaintiff must either retain counsel, who shall enter an appearance in this file and contact counsel for the defendants by that time, or submit to the deposition by the plaintiffs. With respect to plaintiff's fear of assault by other inmates, defendants are instructed to take appropriate precautions to insure plaintiff's deposition is not improperly construed as cooperation with prison authorities. The institution is also to be made aware of plaintiff's fears and encouraged to take whatever steps may be necessary to alleviate them.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ray v. City of Milwaukee

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 16, 2007
Case No. 06-C-1226 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Ray v. City of Milwaukee

Case Details

Full title:LAMAR A. RAY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, JOHN P. KUSPA, MICHAEL W…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Oct 16, 2007

Citations

Case No. 06-C-1226 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, 2007)