From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 21, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-567 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-567

03-21-2019

BARBARA ANN RAY, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2019, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 19) of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court vacate the decision of the administrative law judge denying the application of Barbara Ann Ray ("Ray") for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, and it appearing that the Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") has not objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should afford "reasoned consideration" to the uncontested portions of the report, E.E.O.C. v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at 879), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Carlson's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 19) of Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Ray and against the Commissioner as set forth in the following paragraph.

3. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with this order and the report (Doc. 19) of Magistrate Judge Carlson.

4. The Clerk of Court shall thereafter CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Ray v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 21, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-567 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Ray v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA ANN RAY, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 21, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-567 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2019)