From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Bentley

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 28, 1972
39 Mich. App. 578 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

Docket No. 11350.

Decided March 28, 1972.

Appeal from Livingston, Paul R. Mahinske, J. Submitted Division 2 January 31, 1972, at Lansing. (Docket No. 11350.) Decided March 28, 1972.

Complaint by Gerald V. Ray against Floyd R. Bentley and others to quiet title. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

E. Reed Fletcher, for plaintiff.

Heikkinen, Gates, Yogus Merritt, for defendants.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and VAN VALKENBURG, JJ.

Former circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Const 1963, art 6, § 23 as amended in 1968.


The plaintiff brought this action to quiet title. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's proof the trial court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss under GCR 1963, 504.2. We affirm.

We have carefully examined the record in this case and even if we view everything in the light most favorable to the plaintiff we are unable to say that he has title to the property. The record is such that it is simply impossible to determine who has title. Thus, the plaintiff has failed to carry his burden of proof. Under these circumstances the trial court did not err in granting the motion to dismiss and entering judgment for the defendants.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Ray v. Bentley

Michigan Court of Appeals
Mar 28, 1972
39 Mich. App. 578 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Ray v. Bentley

Case Details

Full title:RAY v. BENTLEY

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 28, 1972

Citations

39 Mich. App. 578 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)
197 N.W.2d 827

Citing Cases

Special Property v. Woodruff

A motion under MCR 2.116(0(10) tests the factual support of a plaintiff's claim and is properly granted if…

Leaven v. Cowels

The Michigan courts have made it clear that the burden of proof in quiet title actions generally rests on the…