From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ray v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 1:12cv1173 DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 1:12cv1173 DLB

07-19-2012

CAROLYN RAY, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant


ORDER ON APPLICATION

TO PROCEED WITHOUT

PREPAYMENT OF FEES

Having considered the application to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 USC §1915; IT IS ORDERED that the application is: X GRANTED.

X The clerk is directed to file the complaint.
X IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk issue summons and the United States marshal serve a copy of the complaint, summons and this order upon the defendant(s) as directed by the plaintiff. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States.
[ ] DENIED, for the following reasons:

Dennis L. Beck

Signature of Judicial Officer

Dennis L. Beck, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Name and Title of Judicial Officer


Summaries of

Ray v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of California
Jul 19, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 1:12cv1173 DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Ray v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN RAY, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 1:12cv1173 DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2012)