Opinion
15340-16
11-22-2022
INDU RAWAT, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
David Gustafson Judge
Still at issue in this case is an "Inventory Gain" issue. Petitioner moved for summary judgment (see Docs. 22, 23) and respondent opposed (see Docs. 51, 53). The Court denied the motion but reconsidered the denial (see Docs. 58, 63, 70, 73).
Respondent has now filed a motion (Doc. 74) for leave to file a supplement to his memorandum (Doc. 53) in opposition to petitioner's motion (Doc. 32) for summary judgment, and he lodged with the motion his proposed 6-page supplement (Doc. 75). It is
ORDERED that the motion for leave (Doc. 74) is granted and that the Clerk of the Court shall file the supplement (Doc. 75). It is further
ORDERED that, no later than December 5, 2022, petitioner may, if she wishes, file a 6-page reply to respondent' supplement.