From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ravold v. Hamm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

March, 1916.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.


The order appealed from was entered February 21, 1916, from which defendant appealed on February 26, 1916. Being a non-enumerated motion, appellant had, under rule 41, fifteen days after taking her appeal to file the printed appeal papers with the clerk. Not having done so, the appellant was in default. But if the appeal be perfected and placed on the April calendar of this court, and counsel are ready when reached, the proceedings in the Surrogate's Court for collection and payment of the judgment will be stayed pending such appeal. Meantime, however, the examination and accounting by the administratrix are not stayed.


Summaries of

Ravold v. Hamm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Ravold v. Hamm

Case Details

Full title:Frank Ravold, Respondent, v. Henry Hamm, Defendant. Louise J. Hamm, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)