addressing wife's arguments that Family Court erroneously granted husband's motion to reopen the divorce to enable husband to request alimony, in appeal taken following Family Court's final judgment awarding husband alimony
Summary of this case from Dorsey v. DorseyNo. 262, 2005.
February 22, 2006.
Appeal from Family CN02-10890.
AFFIRMED.
addressing wife's arguments that Family Court erroneously granted husband's motion to reopen the divorce to enable husband to request alimony, in appeal taken following Family Court's final judgment awarding husband alimony
Summary of this case from Dorsey v. DorseyFull title:RAVINE v. RAVINE
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Feb 22, 2006
See, e.g., Ravine v. Ravine, 2006 WL 453213 (Del. Feb. 22, 2006) (addressing wife's arguments that Family…