Opinion
1:22CV716
09-29-2022
RAVENGRACE MORI EL, Plaintiff, v. HSBC BANK, Defendant.
ORDER
Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge.
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on September 7, 2022, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 9, 10.) Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (see ECF No. 11). The Court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Injunctive Relief Motion, (ECF No. 6), is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
Plaintiff captioned her objections as “Plaintiffs' [sic] Motion for Reconsideration and Emergency Injunction” (the “Objections”) with the case numbers for the instant action and a 2019 lawsuit that she filed against Defendant (among others). (See id. at 1.) As relevant here, however, the Objections “request[] that the Court set aside the Court's September 7, 2022, Recommendation to Dismiss.” (Id. at 8.) Although the Objections address Plaintiff's prior failure to provide evidence of a name change (see, e.g., ECF No. 11-1 at 1), they do not undermine the Recommendation's conclusion that res judicata bars Plaintiff's instant suit, (see ECF No. 9 at 7-9).