From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ravello v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that Moran Towing and Transportation Co., Inc., which the plaintiff proposed to add to the complaint as an additional defendant, is not united in interest with the original defendants ( see, CPLR 203 [b]; Buran v. Coupal, 87 N.Y.2d 173; Desiderio v. Rubin, 234 A.D.2d 581). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion.

Mangano, P.J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ravello v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Ravello v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW RAVELLO, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 530 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 324

Citing Cases

Simpson v. Four Keys Enterprises

In opposition, it was argued that the Statute of Limitations period had expired, and that 303 West 42nd was…