From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Raval v. U.S. Truck, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 9, 2022
No. 21-11187 (E.D. Mich. May. 9, 2022)

Opinion

21-11187

05-09-2022

SWETA A. RAVAL, Plaintiff, v. USA TRUCK, INC., and JOHN PAUL TRICE, Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS

DAVID M. LAWSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On May 9, 2022, the defendant filed a notice of supplemental exhibits to its motion for summary judgment. The notice and exhibits will be stricken because the briefing on the motion already was completed in due course, and the defendant did not seek leave to file any supplements. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(1)(A) (“Unless the court permits otherwise, each motion and response to a motion must be accompanied by a single brief.”) (emphasis added). Moreover, the Court is aware of two of the four noticed exhibits because the defendant already attached them to its reply in support of its summary judgment motion. See Richard Jackson Report, ECF No. 40-7; Brian Kirschner Report, ECF No. 40-8.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant's notice of supplemental exhibits (ECF No. 46) is STRICKEN.


Summaries of

Raval v. U.S. Truck, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 9, 2022
No. 21-11187 (E.D. Mich. May. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Raval v. U.S. Truck, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SWETA A. RAVAL, Plaintiff, v. USA TRUCK, INC., and JOHN PAUL TRICE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 9, 2022

Citations

No. 21-11187 (E.D. Mich. May. 9, 2022)