From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rausch v. Monfort

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1937
251 App. Div. 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

June 25, 1937.


Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve a further notice, specifying facts which he must prove in order to sustain his cause of action. The practice of incorporating the allegations of the complaint into a notice of examination is not to be approved, particularly where such allegations consist in part at least of conclusions of law and fact. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rausch v. Monfort

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1937
251 App. Div. 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Rausch v. Monfort

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR F. RAUSCH, Respondent, v. ELIZABETH B. MONFORT, etc., and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1937

Citations

251 App. Div. 868 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Milbeck Apts. v. Corby Associates

The other items stated in the notice are subject to the same criticisms. An examination before trial is not…

Lakeville Merrick v. Town Board of the Town

The examination shall proceed on 10 days' written notice by plaintiff to defendants, or at such other time as…