From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rauda v. Garland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
21-cv-05734-CRB (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-05734-CRB

09-09-2021

WILLIAN MATIAS RAUDA, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B GARLAND, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT

CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge.

On August 4, 2021, the Court denied Plaintiff Willian Matias Rauda's motion for a TRO and petition for a writ of mandamus. See Order (dkt. 17). Mr. Matias now moves the Court to amend its order. See Mot. (dkt. 18). Mr. Matias argues that the Court erred in addressing the merits of Mr. Matias's claims after concluding that the Court lacked jurisdiction over those claims. See Id. at 1.

The Court denies the motion to amend for the reasons stated in the government's opposition. See Opp. (dkt. 19). The Court also notes that the Court addressed the merits, and thus provided an alternative basis for its ruling, in an effort to facilitate the efficient resolution of any potential appeal given that Mr. Matias's deportation was set for August 13, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rauda v. Garland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
21-cv-05734-CRB (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Rauda v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAN MATIAS RAUDA, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B GARLAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

21-cv-05734-CRB (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)